Environmental
Stress: Cool Climates
Responses to cold can be
described by two physiological responses; these responses are ones which retain
heat and ones which increase heat production. Heat retention is considered to
be the most beneficial because it requires less energy. This disrupts the
survival of humans by disturbing homeostasis because energy comes from
nutrition and diet. This is a problem because in cold conditions there is
typically not very much food. This makes heat retention important because it became
the primary way to survive without heat from food.
One short term way that humans have an
adapted to cold is by vasoconstriction. Vasoconstriction minimizes heat loss
making it an energy efficient way of maintaining heat in the cold. Vasoconstriction
is when blood vessels narrow in order to reduce blood flow to the skin. This
response is involuntary and reduces heat loss at the surface of skin. A
Facultative response to cold at times was voluntary exercise. Though this
method warmed the body by generating muscle heat this was not the ideal method
because is required food and nutrients from food in order to maintain energy.
Developmental responses to cold have been found in changes of the facial shape.
Additionally, cold has an effect on metabolic rate. The cooler the climate the
faster the metabolic rate of the people
within it. Cultural responses to cold include, building fires, using animal skin
as clothing, and building shelters.
Vasoconstriction VS. Vasodilation
Vasoconstriction in Hands
Faculative: Voluntary Excercise
Developmental Response to Cold: Global Metabolic Impact
Cultural Response to Cold
Studying how cooler climates
effected the evolution of humans can be very informational in regards to how we
came to where we are based on how different hominid species were able to survive
and adapt to their surroundings in order to live and reproduce. The environment
has much to do with our bodies, how fast we metabolize food, what kind of food
we take, and how we behave given the resources that are available in cooler
climates. This is all useful in allowing
us to learn more about our background and how we as people better acclimate to
certain environments today and how we have evolved to do so. This in my opinion
reveals a lot about human history and how different people live in specific
areas that are better suited for their physiological needs. This information
can be productive in case of traveling or even emergencies. It is important to
keep in mind especially when traveling to different areas how our bodies may
not be used to certain conditions and what we must do in order to be better
suited. For example, if you are going sailing and you are moving into cooler
areas with rougher conditions it would be wise to know how to protect yourself
from the cold and what to do to preserve energy.
Using race in adaptation number two
for exercise would be difficult, however, perhaps instead of focusing on how
different races may be predisposed to be better at some exercise or have more
ways of achieving better ways to survive or maintain homeostasis a better response
would be to question how different people have different builds which allow
them different athletic or survival abilities. Instead of the question of who
is the best race to adapt it should be a question of what build physically is
the best suited in certain climates based on their physical ability. A valuable
lesson is that all people regardless of race are built differently. Perhaps
then and even now different people regardless of race some people physically
may have had a less difficult time using energy to voluntarily jump around or
stay active than others did to acclimate to the cool weather. We can better
understand people when race is separated from what we can and cannot do as well
as what we expect of others. Race does not define a weaker or stronger group, however,
perhaps we may assert that different people regardless of race are better
designed to perform certain tasks or survive certain conditions.
Works
Cited
Jurmaine,
Robert. "Modern Human Biology: Patterns of Adaptation." Introduction
to Physical Anthropology. 2013-2014 ed. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2014.
Print.





.jpg)
The first section asks how cold stress itself negatively impacts homeostasis. You talk about how humans adapt to cold stress and then identify how these adaptations can have complications. These are secondary. What does cold do to the human body? How can it harm it? Cold stress can result in the drop in the core body temperature, leading to hypothermia, frostbite, organ failure and even death.
ReplyDeleteOkay on the vasoconstriction for short term. Another example is shivering which helps to general body warmth through muscle action.
Facultative adaptations are physiological responses, not behavioral or cultural. Alternative vasoconstriction/vasodilation is an example, but so is increasing body fat (heat retention) and increasing metabolism (heat production).
" Developmental responses to cold have been found in changes of the facial shape"
Yes, but this needed explanation. Is it just the face that changes shape? Also, recognize that developmental traits are genetic and are inherent in all members of a population that have lived in cold climates over many generations, so it is not something that will be acquired by an individual but there from birth.
Yes, cold will impact the metabolic rate, but again, if it is developmental trait, the metabolic rate won't change. It will be higher from birth.
Good discussion on the productive use of this information.
"Race does not define a weaker or stronger group, however, perhaps we may assert that different people regardless of race are better designed to perform certain tasks or survive certain conditions."
You are dancing around a key point here. It is okay to say that race is not useful in studying biological variation! Race is a subjective social construct, not a biological one, so how could we use it to objective understand biological traits?
Dear Professor;
ReplyDeleteCold in question one, to further explain during hypothermia the body must use energy from the core, chest, heart, and the abdomen to maintain heat and prevent hypothermia. Hypothermia is considered a highly dangerous drop in body temperature which may lead to damage to respiratory and central nervous system as well as motor skill impairment. Sometimes death and lose of consciousness is a result of hypothermia. additionally frost bite can cause loss of limbs and similar respiratory and cardiovascular issues.
Heat retention is a faculitative response because it is something the body does automatically as well as heat production. However it is more beneficial for heat retention to occur because it requires a less amount of energy than heat production.
Not only do faces change as a developmental response but specifically noses and nasal areas for breathing which become differently acclimated to the weather. Additionally changes occur within the body that include long term changes in blood flow which also has an impact on the bodies morphing to acclimate to cool weather.
We can use the concept of race not being useful in studying biological variation because many ages before us we know that this construction came from the need of our ancestors to categorize us. From there on we put labels on categorizing colors of people and their races. This is beneficial to us today because we can apply this knowledge to many social issues; for example, crime hasn't all that much to do with race as it has to do with the individual in general.
Thank you for the response. Just one comment from your last paragraph:
Delete"We can use the concept of race not being useful in studying biological variation..."
Reread that sentence and see if it makes sense to you. You are still looking for a way to use race in studying human variation. My point here is that you can't, and it is okay to say that.